Home > Articles > Penn State: A Not-So-Obvious Lesson
Penn State: A Not-So-Obvious Lesson
Instead of piling more opinion and outrage on this issue, let's examine a common-sense lesson that's easily overlooked.


Sign up for our free Building Church Leaders newsletter:
 



Also of Interest
Dealing with Staff
Deal with staff conflict in a Christ-honoring way.

Church Facilities Management
Be a good steward of the building, land, and other resources that God has given to your church.




Ministry Review of Objectives and Goals (free sample)


How Churches Can Mix Religion and Politics
Know your rights and restrictions before you engage politics as a church.

In the United States, a person charged with a crime remains innocent until proven guilty. For that reason, this article will allow the judicial system sole responsibility to declare judgment on everyone involved in the Penn State abuses case. For that reason, you'll see words like "alleged" in the paragraphs to follow.

Instead of piling more opinion and outrage on this issue, though, let's examine a common-sense lesson that seems overlooked.

Understandable disbelief exists at the apparent lack of aggressive reporting to authorities about events that allegedly took place. Debate swirls about who knew what and when. Mandatory reporting, a moral responsibility to report, and what might have happened with such reporting are topics that provide fuel and fervor to the public discussion taking place on the airwaves, in print, and across the electronic world.

One responder to a news article, who identified herself as a grandmother, made a weighty comment in response to a story focused on the responsibility to report suspected abuse cases to authorities. The article described a situation in which a person allegedly witnessed a horrendous act in progress. To paraphrase, she said that anyone who witnesses obvious child abuse taking place should first muster momentary courage to at least yell "Stop!"

Great point, Grandma. Evil acts thrive in darkness. Silence, turning the other way, or leaving the situation keeps the shades pulled down. Yes, reporting to authorities must take place. But in the moment, consider the child.

My son and daughter attend a high school where students developed an anti-bullying campaign built around the phrase "Don't be a zebra." A group chose this theme after learning that when a predator attacks a zebra, other zebras close by do nothing to help. Their campaign's applicability to our discussion is as obvious as a black-and-white striped coat. So why would an adult choose the zebra approach?

Fear of reprisal. Fear of losing a job. Fear of investigations. Fear of "my word against your word." Fear, fear, fear. But always for self, not for what's happening to the child.

If asked, most people likely would say that they would do something if they were to witness a dark act like child sexual abuse. Okay, maybe many would. Unfortunately, it seems, none of those people were around for the supposed 15 years of crimes in Pennsylvania. Rather than judging those people, too, let's look closer to home.

What about willingness to stop physical abuse as it happens? Or verbal abuse? This issue becomes complicated when considering that one person's version of abuse is another's version of discipline. To say something might appear to question a parent or guardian's authority to handle a child in the manner he or she sees fit. Possibly a parent has experienced an unusually hard season of life, a rough day at work, or a typical holiday shopping experience, and now overreacts. Unfortunately, this conundrum creates enough tension to scare people into inaction. Please don't go zebra so easily.

No First PageNo Previous Page Page 1 of 2 Next PageLast Page
share this pageshare this page


Topics:Church Safety, Crime, Legal issues, Liability, Policies, Security, Sexual abuse
Filters:Children's ministry, Children's pastor, Pastor, Youth ministry
References:None


User Reviews

Average User Rating:

Displaying 1–1 of 1 comments

Philip Lindsey

December 06, 2011  6:04am

The sole reason everyone at Penn State remained silent is the gender of the victims. Remember the outcry at Duke? Long after the accuser was exposed as a lying, drug-addicted whore, the media continued dogging the falsely accused victims. You, yourselves, at CT did so. Somewhere in your archives is an op-ed piece denying the Duke LX'ers innocence, on the spurious grounds that they did not meet your contributor's moral standards.

Report Abuse

Submit Your Rating and Review *

Low

High

1000 character limit

* Comments may be edited for tone and clarity.


Member Center
Log in


Meet Our Editorial Advisors

We Recommend

More from Christianity Today